This is the Quest for the Ring Express Version, consisiting of all Reports in the traditional blog format and virtually no features on an extremely fast loading page.

You may prefer the main home page, which is chock loaded with features. The home page takes 15-20 seconds to load if you have a fast connection and longer than that if you have a slow connection.
THE QUEST FOR THE RING PRIMARY HOME PAGE (Loaded with features)

Monday, January 26, 2009

Guide to NBA Games: January 27 2009

This is a trial run for a new feature we are considering: a daily quick evaluation of the games that will be played in the NBA. You get how close the game is predicted to be, how much significance the game has for determining what is likely to happen in the playoffs (including which teams will be in the playoffs) a notice if a team has the big disadvantage of playing on back to back nights, notice of reported injuries for both teams, and an overall ranking of the game on a scale of 0 to 10.

Sacramento KINGS at Cleveland CAVALIERS
How Close Prediction: The Cavaliers will bury the Kings (20+ points)
Playoff Outlook Significance: Virtually None
Back to Back: Neither Team
Cavaliers Injuries:
--Delonte West: Out indefinitely - Wrist - 1/16/09 He is expected to miss up to six weeks with a broken right wrist.
--Zydrunas Ilgauskus: Late Jan - Ankle - 1/3/09 Is expected to miss three to four weeks with a chip fracture in his left ankle.
Kings Injuries:
--Shelden Williams: PF Wrist Questionable for Jan. 27 at Cleveland
OVERALL RANK OF GAME FROM 0 to 10: 0

Indiana PACERS AT Orlando MAGIC
How Close Prediction: The Magic will win big over the Pacers, by 15-19 pts.
Playoff Outlook Significance: Very Little
Back to Back: Neither Team
Pacers Injuries:
--Roy Hibbert: Ques Tues - Concussion - 1/26/09 Is dealing with a mild concussion
--Jamaal Tinsley: Out indefinitely - Disciplinary - 10/27/08 He is has been suspended indefinitley.
Magic Injuries:
--Mickael Pietrus: Out indefinitely - Wrist - 12/31/08 He is dealing with a right wrist fracture.
--Mike Wilks: out for season - Knee - 10/27/08 He will miss the entire season with a torn right ACL/MCL
OVERALL RANK OF GAME FROM 0 to 10: 2

Denver NUGGETS at Memphis GRIZZLIES
How Close Prediction: The Nuggets will win a very close game over the Grizzlies, by 1-4 points.
Playoff Outlook Significance: Virtually None
Back to Back: Neither Team
Nuggets Injuries:
--Carmelo Anthony: Out Indefinitely - Hand - 1/23/09 He fractured his right shooting hand and has been out since early January. He has now been cleared for on court workouts and has set a return date of January 30th.
Grizzlies Injuries:
--Darko Milicic: Out indefinitely - Hand - 12/27/08 He has a broken knuckle on his right hand.
OVERALL RANK OF GAME FROM 0 to 10: 5

San Antonio SPURS at Utah JAZZ
How Close Prediction: The Spurs will win a close game over the Jazz, by 5-9 points.
Playoff Outlook Significance: Extremely Significant
Back to Back: Neither Team
Spurs Injuries:
--No Injuries
Jazz Injuries:
--Andrei Kirilenko: Out indefinitely - Ankle - 1/26/09 Is out with inflammation in his right ankle.
--Carlos Boozer: Mid Feb - Quadricep - 12/18/08 He is expected to miss at least four weeks while recovering from knee surgery.
OVERALL RANK OF GAME FROM 0 to 10: 7

Charlotte BOBCATS at Los Angeles LAKERS
How Close Prediction: The Lakers will win solidly over the Bobcats, by 10-14 points.
Playoff Outlook Significance: Little
Back to Back: Neither Team
Bobcats Injuries:
--D.J. Augustin: Early Feb - Abdominal - 1/26/09 Is expcted to miss another week with an abdominal strain.
--Sean May: Out indefinitely - Knee - 12/18/08 He is suffering from tendinitis in his right knee.
Lakers Injuries:
--No Injuries
OVERALL RANK OF GAME FROM 0 to 10: 3



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Playoff Projections as of Jan. 26 2009

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that serious basketball fans should spend a lot more time watching and thinking about playoff games and a lot less time watching and thinking about regular season games. I think if you are a really serious fan, you should be spending some time going back and watching and thinking about last year's playoff games while the current year's regular season games are going on. I think you could easily justify spending as much as 40% to even 50% of your basketball time on playoff games while the regular season is ongoing.

Which motivates me to start issuing weekly playoff projections, from the middle of the regular season on.

PROJECTIONS AS OF JAN 27 2009
Look for Weekly Updates
EAST CONFERENCE FINAL FOUR
Boston Celtics
Cleveland Cavaliers
Orlando Magic
Detroit Pistons
WEST CONFERENCE FINAL FOUR
Los Angeles Lakers
San Antonio Spurs
New Orleans Hornets
Houston Rockets
EAST FINAL
Boston Celtics over Orlando Magic
WEST FINAL
Los Angeles Lakers over New Orleans Hornets
NBA CHAMPIONSHIP
Los Angeles Lakers over Boston Celtics 4 games to 3

Yes, it's true: I'm very worried that the Pistons won't win a playoff series. On the one hand, they are engaged in all kinds of sophisticated team management, which is gradually improving their playoff chances. On the other hand, they do have a complicated puzzle to deal with (that no one else has ever attempted to solve, I emphasize) and they do have players in relative slumps, especially Rasheed Wallace, and they, like all teams in trouble, don't seem to be able to play good offense and good defense in the same game. In the last 6 weeks, it's been mostly good defense games, but now that they have at least half solved the Iverson puzzle (degree of difficulty at least 9/10) they are suddenly playing good offense but not good defense.

I'll keep the faith for now that they will have both the good offense and the good defense when the playoffs are here, and will squeak by whoever they play in the first round, which I am thinking will be the Atlanta Hawks, and had better be them because if it's Orlando or Cleveland, then I doubt the Pistons are going to win a series after all.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Big Upgrades for Quest Rumors, Quest Videos, and the Hoopz Live Games Site

The Quest web designer has been very ambitious lately and many important pages have been upgraded, even though they were pretty much already the best such pages on the internet. Here are the highlights of recent upgrades:

The Quest For the Ring NBA Rumors

Even before the makeover and upgrade, this was already the most comprehensive source of breaking NBA stories on the internet. Now it is so far ahead of any other page that we honestly doubt that anyone will ever catch up even if we never improve it again! Simply put, if you visit here, you will learn about every breaking development in the NBA that you care to learn about. Aside from massive NBA coverage, there is some extra coverage of the Pistons and the Nuggets.

The Quest For the Ring Videos

To make a long story short, there are a lot more videos that you can easily choose from than there already were. The variety is even greater than before.

Live Games and Completed Game Videos Available for Download

An annoyingly huge number of hours overall have gone into this site, because it is so tricky to be able to figure out the best ways to access live games, and to access download links for videos of completed games. Sites come and go. Streams can be worthless. Programs become more or less important as time goes by. The changes are continuous. But that's the whole point of this site, which is done by a friend of Quest: to keep up with the continuous changes and to keep you connected with the best ways to watch games.

The site has recently been upgraded very substantially. There are now some very key playoff games posted in full, thanks to YouTube, including games 1, 3, and 4 of the Nuggets-Lakers April / May 2008 playoff series. The links to sources for downloading full, completed NBA games have been massively improved. The recommended programs section has been upgraded. Finally, this site is really and truly a guaranteed ticket to NBA games.



BallHype: hype it up!





You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Introducing the Quest for the Ring Ning

The Quest For the Ring Ning is now created. You can post basketball pictures, videos, blog entries, almost anything and everything. You can get discussions going. You can set up groups or events to, for example, get an informal League going. In the early days of the Ning, when there will be few members, we will post videos, pictures, blog entries, and so forth as time permits. Later on, we hope others will be driving the ball to the hoop as much or more as we do. Here is the address:

http://thequestforthering.ning.com



BallHype: hype it up!







You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Friday, January 23, 2009

Fast Break: Dahntay Jones to Start in the Playoffs? Denver Can't be Serious, Can They?

You probably know that Dahntay Jones has been starting a lot of games for the Denver Nuggets at shooting guard this season, even though he was not on the team last year, and even though he was picked up from the waiver wires by Denver last July, with very few other teams having any interest in him. and even though he has never started to any degree before now, even though he played for two of the worst teams in the League.

Before we see whether he should be starting, let's find out a little about Dahntay Jones as quickly as possible, which can be done by quoting from wikipedia:

Dahntay Lavall Jones (born December 27, 1980 in Trenton, New Jersey) is an American professional basketball player, currently playing for the Denver Nuggets of the NBA. Originally a student at Rutgers University, Jones transferred to Duke University to play alongside his boyhood Jersey friend Jay Williams who encouraged him to join him in Durham, North Carolina. He was selected by the Boston Celtics in the first round (20th overall) of the 2003 NBA Draft, and his rights were later traded, along with the rights to Troy Bell, to the Grizzlies for the rights to Kendrick Perkins and Marcus Banks. Jones played his first four professional seasons for the Grizzlies, averaging 3.7 points per game.

Jones grew up in Hamilton Square, New Jersey and starred in Steinert High School in Hamilton Township, Mercer County from 1995-1998. He averaged 24 points and 9 rebounds as a senior and was named as a McDonald's All-America honorable mention.

Even though Jones enjoyed a career season in 2007, no team signed him until on September 26, 2007, Jones signed a non-guaranteed contract with the Boston Celtics, but was later waived by the team on October 25, 2007.

Jones was signed by the Sacramento Kings on December 10, 2007. He was waived on February 16, 2008. Jones signed with the Denver Nuggets in July 2008 for the 2008-09 season.



Dahntay Jones' first five years were all with major losing teams: 4 years with the wretched Grizzlies, and last year with the wretched Kings. He started a grand total of 36 games for those wretched teams in all those five years combined, whereas this half a year alone for Denver he has started 39 games in front of J.R. Smith! Is that not totally ludicrous or am I missing something that is really something and not a figment of someone's warped imagination?

No, I'm straight. and there is no doubt that J.R. Smith is a much better shooting guard than is Dahntay Jones. Smith has a real player rating through Jan. 15 of .787. Dahntay Jones' real player rating is .455. Furthermore, Quest has proof that Smith's defending is much improved over his defending from two and more years ago, and is at least as good as the defending of Jones. Jones is smarter than Smith, most likely, and apparently has a better personality, things that matter a lot in Colorado. But so what? How do general intelligence and personality advantages trump a huge difference in basketball ability and production? This is basketball, not jeopardy or the dating game.

But George Karl is continuing to, like an unusually stubborn adolescent, refuse to start J.R. Smith, which means, assuming it continues through the entire regular season, that the Nuggets are claiming they can succeed in the playoffs with a starting shooting guard who was not even good enough to start for major losing teams. This is yet another clue among many that this franchise is not at all serious about winning in the playoffs; they are going to call it a day after looking flashy and aggressive while winning in the regular season.

Aside from Smith, there are not one but two other non-starting players who have very high ratings, ones normally associated with starters, and ratings far higher than that of Jones. One is Renaldo Balkman, a third year player who, while solidifying his reputation as a very good defender, has been far better offensively this year than almost anyone thought possible, although in limited minutes.

The other one is Chris Andersen, yet another defensive specialist, and another one who has produced to some extent offensively. But since Andersen is a C-PF, and Balkman is a SF-SG, it would make a lot more sense to replace Jones with Balkman.

Although the main, conventional, obvious point is that J.R. Smith should be starting at 2-guard instead of Dahntay Jones, it is interesting to note that were the Nuggets to start Balkman instead of Jones, and if necessary switch to Andersen if Balkman didn't work out, they would really and truly be a very good and improved defensive team, instead of just fooling the public that they are improved defensively as they actually are doing. I might actually start to break a sweat that the Nuggets could win a playoff series were Jones to be replaced by Smith, Balkman, or even by Andersen in the starting lineup.

Dahntay Jones is scoring no more points than is Chris Andersen per 36 minutes, and he is scoring about 2 points less than Renaldo Balkman per 36 minutes! So by starting Jones instead of Andersen or Balkman, you are getting no more scoring and lessor overall defending than you would get with Balkman or Andersen. I mean Andersen and Balkman are every bit as much hustle "little things" players as is Jones, yet they produce more defensive things other than hustle than Jones, and just as many offensive things, so it is a no brainer that, were J.R. Smith out, you would want to start either Balkman or Andersen over Jones, with Balkman being the correct choice due to position.

But this being the Nuggets, I am very comfortable that nothing like this is going to happen. It seems that every year, George Karl gets infatuated with one of his guards, and grossly overestimates his quality and abilities. It's generally a guard who is a little shorter than normal for his position too. Although one year it was a guard grossly shorter than normal: Earl Boykins. All of these guards seem to excel in the "little things" that the NBA does not bother to keep track of. I hate to inform Mr. Karl that there are only so many loose balls to get, charges to take, and other items to go for, that are not counted by scorekeepers, and that are not in the Real Player Rating or any other similar rating, but that Karl is grossly over impressed by.

Before Jones, in the last two seasons, Karl's infatuation was with point guard Anthony Carter who, however, was unceremoniously ditched for the 2008 Lakers playoff series by Karl, who apparently realized about six months too late that he had missed the boat as far as point guards are concerned. This year's flavor of the moment is Jones who, along with Andersen and Balkman, are previously little played players making up the aggressive on defense, fast and hard charging on offense, and energetic on both ends playing approach of this team.

What must have impressed Karl too, though he would never admit it in public, was when Jones tripped to the floor Grant Hill, who for the Suns was driving to the hoop with about 3 seconds left in a tie game in Denver recently. Amazingly, the Suns did not win the game as they were entitled to, because the refs blew the call and did not allow Grant to shoot free throws. The Suns seemingly ran out of oxygen in the 5th quarter in the high altitude and so went on to lose.

In summary, Dahntay Jones would be lucky to be playing at all for any real contender, yet for Denver he is starting over J.R. Smith, Renaldo Balkman, and Chris Andersen. He is getting 20 minutes a game, far more than in any other season, with the exception of 2006-07 for Memphis, when he received about 21 1/2 minutes per game. It's this year's "Karl Special," and like all the previous specials, it will be nothing more than road kill in the playoffs.

BASKETBALL REFERENCE PAGES YOU MIGHT WANT TO CHECK OUT
J.R. Smith
Renaldo Balkman
Chris Andersen
Dahntay Jones



BallHype: hype it up!










You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Break: Michael Curry and Joe Dumars Attempt to Solve the Iverson Puzzle

The heavy duty Iverson fans got their wish this week, Pistons Coach Michael Curry (or it might have been General Manager Joe Dumars, or both of them together) decided that Allen Iverson would start and that Richard Hamilton would not be starting for the first time in years, despite the fact that he is one of the best shooting guards in the League, despite the fact that his shooting is desperately needed by the Pistons both now and in the playoffs, and despite the fact that Hamilton's only sin was being disturbed and distracted by not knowing what Iverson was going to do on any particular play. Iverson decides on each and every play which guard position he is going to play for that particular play, and since he plays both of them well, and since this has been going on for many years, no one wants to tell him to stop doing that.

I was on the losing side of the great "Who Starts, Hamilton or Iverson?" debate. Among other reasons, the last reason for AI not starting that I grew to like was that it would make the Pistons' 2nd unit one of the most and probably the most deadly 2nd unit in the game. Since Iverson plays both guard positions at once and usually takes care of both of them well at the same time, you could have 3 forwards and a center in the game at the same time. Four quality Pistons defensive players and Iverson would be a much better version of the Sixers and a much more successful version.

The important things Curry must accomplish, regardless of what he knows or doesn't know about how complicated it is to make sure Iverson's game does not actually do more harm than good, are:

1. End what they are calling in Detroit "small ball". This is where Iverson and Hamilton play at the same time, along with who everyone agrees is a great, starting, and with any luck playoffs-qualified point guard, Rodney Stuckey. Small ball has been pretty much a disaster for the Pistons, due to rebounding and defending going down the tubes. Please, end it and don't bring it back.

2. Cut way back or eliminate small forward Tayshaun Prince running the point; this would work even less well in the playoffs than it has in the regular. This is too crafty to work in the real world. Prince has a lot more important things to do for the Pistons than run point, especially considering how both Hamilton and Rasheed Wallace have not been shooting well this season.

3. Keep the not working Prince/Iverson/Hamilton combination down, which mostly means, since Prince must play mega minutes, keep the Iverson/Hamilton combination down. Hamilton needs a traditional or standard point guard to work with and everyone agrees that Iverson is not that. And obviously Prince is not that either; Hamilton?Prince is never going to work as a backcourt either.

4. Keep the Stuckey/Iverson combination down too, for a very important indirect reason. Without Hamilton making some jump shots, the Pistons do not have enough offense for the playoffs. You can not run every play to the hoop, especially in the playoffs; you have to have some players knocking down jumpers. But Hamilton plays poorly with Iverson and much better with Stuckey. Hamilton is disturbed by someone playing both guard positions at once, and I can't say that I blame him; I've been reporting on how that can mess up an offense and make it less efficient for many moons.

Now since Stuckey can only play so many minutes, you have to divide his minutes between Stuckey/Iverson and Stuckey/Hamilton. If you start Stuckey/Iverson and go a lot of minutes that way, you don't have enough Stuckey minutes left for Stuckey/Hamilton.

5. No one is arguing that Iverson's minutes should be limited. As mentioned already, I would really want to see Curry make sure that Iverson gets his 35 minutes a game and have that filled out to a greater extent with Iverson and the bigger, quality defensive, but offensively less dynamic group of Pistons, players such as Antonio McDyess, Jason Maxiell, Kwame Brown, and Amir Johnson. You know and I know that Hamilton can't do much of anything with those players. Hamilton can't do much of anything with anyone except Stuckey.

6. You have to stick up for Hamilton's minutes too. This guy in recent years produced what are for a shooting guard some of the sweetest shooting percentages in history. He must play rock bottom minimum 30 minutes a game, or the Pistons are seriously shooting themselves in the foot.

7. Here is the bottom line number one objective for Curry in terms of minutes: Since Hamilton should be close to 30 minutes and Iverson 35-40, you will have to have up to 20 minutes of Iverson/Hamilton regardless of who starts. I would divide and conquer; I would make sure Stuckey is in for about 10 of those and be left with the situation Hamilton can't work with for just 10 minutes or so. You limit the damage to 10 minutes of small ball and 10 minutes of Iverson/Hamilton crazy ball.

Since Stuckey plays 30, his breakdown would be ideally 10 minutes of Stuckey/Iverson/Hamilton, 10 minutes of Stuckey/Hamilton, and just 10 minutes of Stuckey/Iverson. Alright class, let's sum it up and become less confused:

SUMMARY
Iverson/Hamilton with No Stuckey 10
Iverson/Hamilton/Stuckey 10
Stuckey/Hamilton with No Iverson 10
Stuckey/Iverson with No Hamilton 10
Iverson/ No Stuckey and No Hamilton 5-10

It's like a damn rubrick's cube! Just remember the number 10 Curry, the key to solving the puzzle is the number 10! Or if you have to have it even simpler still, just remember that when Hamilton and Iverson are out there and nether Stuckey nor reserve point guard Will Bynum is out there, your offense is most likely going to be bad and sometimes really bad.

Curry and the Pistons most likely fail offensively if the Stuckey/Iverson minutes are much above 10, because if so, there is no way to make sure Hamilton contributes. And then you also have the old Nuggets and Sixers Iverson problem. I call that problem the two point guard problem, and both your offense and defense are damaged to some extent by it. You are too small defensively. Offensively, you either have one guard of limited value that the defense can ignore, if you have what should really be a reserve point guard in there with Iverson. This was the Denver situation. Or, and this would be the potential Detroit problem, you are wasting the overall game potential of two starting, playmaking guards by having them in there at the same time. So I'll be monitoring the Stuckey/Iverson minutes especially, because you can't solve this unless they are limited.

You want to know the truth? The truth is the Nuggets' Iverson puzzle was easy compared to this one, yet Nuggets Coach George Karl could not even begin to solve it, whereas Curry and Dumars are at least aware that they have a puzzle to solve and are doing their darndest to solve it.

So solve this puzzle and keep the Larry Brown caused damage down Mr. Curry and you will win your playoff series and not be fired. But if everything gets blamed on Iverson you won't be fired even if you lose. Among coaches, including Larry Brown and George Karl, blaming Iverson for something he didn't do is an effective, tried, and tested way to dodge responsibility.

By starting Iverson instead of Hamilton, it is more difficult to get much of the above achieved, but it is still possible. I guess Curry just likes to solve complicated problems. That would put him several steps ahead of George Karl, who seemingly has blown off every complicated problem he ever encountered.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Breaks: Owners Going Cheap, and Keeping the Faith

TNT analyst David Aldridge recently had the following up at NBA.com in this article:

Many owners are cheap. In a rip-roaring bull market like we had in the mid-90s,
there were still NBA owners with little incentive or compunction to spend
wildly. In an environment like the current credit/housing/jobs freefall, the
likelihood that there will be a dozen or more teams throwing money around in a
year and a half is laughable. There are more than a few owners, I'm afraid, who
have absolutely no intention of using the cap room their GMs are currently
clearing, preferring to pocket the money instead of investing in a game-changing
player

This is so true in the case of the Nuggets, thank you Mr. Aldridge, and I hope you don't get disallowed from posting at NBA.com after just a few posts, due to a revolt by the owners.

Aside from that, I agree with this writer's main points:

1. Never underestimate any year's available to draft players
2. Always consider the demand as well as the supply; if demand is low, your team can do a lot better than if demand is normal or high.

A point I will add:

You can't win with just one or two $20,000,000 a year players automatically, you have to have quality, economical players at the mid and lower pay grades as well. Fortunately, who wins in the playoffs in the NBA is not just about who gets LeBron James and Kobe Bryant. They have to have quality teammates to win it all.

KEEPING THE FAITH
I still have faith that the Pistons will win their playoff series even if they do not have home court advantage, whereas the Nuggets will lose their playoff series even if they do have home court advantage. I think that when this relatively surprising but not shocking season is all said and done that I will be very, very satisfied because the Pistons will find the way to win their playoff series while the Nuggets will be unable to win theirs.



BallHype: hype it up!





You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Break: Chauncey Billups is a Leader but Unfortunately Mostly of the X's and O's Variety

I think that teams such as San Antonio and Boston who have centers or forwards as motivational leaders are generally more successful in the playoffs than teams that have point guards as motivational leaders.

I'm not sold on Billups being all that great a motivational leader. Better than average I'll say yes but not a great motivational leader like Kevin Garnett or Tim Duncan or even Dirk Nowitzki.

I'd really like to see more coaches being good motivational leaders but I realize that's much more of a college thing in the modern age. Coaches motivating extra effort and speed and so forth is much more of a thing of the past in the NBA than a thing of the present. If you go back in time in the NBA, especially if you go back to the 1950's and 1960's, there was much less difference back in those days than there is today between how college coaches and how the pro coaches coach, and specifically with respect to how much the coach tries to motivate players to keep their energy and effort levels up.

While I wouldn't go so far as to claim that today's NBA coaches in general or George Karl in particular have no motivational leadership impact at all, I would say that the very high levels of energy and aggression that the Nuggets are showing this year are much more generated by the players themselves, acting collectively, than they are by the Nuggets' coaches.

To me Billups is leading more in the deciding what to do aspect but not as much on the motivating aspect. The Nuggets are motivated to win simply because they are a lot more happy than most teams are to simply be in the game. Individual Nuggets players have been hammered by injuries and other trials and tribulations over the years much more so than average.

As for the Pistons, I don't think Detroit is worrying about not having Chauncey Billups' leadership in the playoffs, regardless of the breakdown between and quantities of his X's and O's and his motivational leadership. They have a bunch of very veteran players all motivating each other, so they don't need it very much. Not to mention they have as many or more players than any team who motivate themselves extremely well.

Stupid sportscaster alert: if and whenever you hear a sportscaster claim that the Pistons "are missing Billups leadership," he is a bonafide fool for saying that. Rasheed Wallace, Prince, Dice, Stuckey, AI, Hamilton need to be motivated? I don't think so. The Pistons who were on the 2004 Championship team mostly motivated themselves, individually and as a team collectively. While there was a lot of X's and O's leadership going from Billups to the rest of the Pistons, there wasn't much motivational leadership.

The reason that the X's and O's leadership of Billups is so important to the Nuggets is simply that the Nugget's coaches are very weak on X's and O's leadership. The Pistons have more X's and O's leadership coming from their coaches and managers, including General Manager Joe Dumars who, don't kid yourself, is undoubtedly assisting rookie Coach Michael Curry with the X's and O's matters. Maybe not as much as I, a perfectionist, would want, but they probably have more than enough of it.

So in conclusion, I am not worrying about the Pistons in the playoffs with respect to either X's and O's leadership or with respect to motivational leadership. Whereas, with the Nuggets, I am quite worried about where the playoffs motivational leadership comes from. I think they still have a big problem in that regard just as they did last year.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Break: Nuggets Management and Coach George Karl are Often Not on the Same Page

The Nuggets have never decided for sure about just how much they want to worship George Karl. On the one hand they obviously worship him much more than most other franchises would. To the Nuggets, Mr. Karl's inability to win playoff games is a relatively minor demerit. The average franchise does need to be concerned about being successful in the playoffs, so the average franchise would have let Mr. Karl move on no later than this past off season.

On the other hand, Mr. Karl has never had a large amount of say over key player acquisition decisions in Denver. If Mr. Karl was always so dependent on having a good, traditional, veteran point guard who doesn't need any coaching to speak of, then why on earth did the Nuggets ship Andre Miller for Allen Iverson? They kind of pulled the rug out from under poor Mr. Karl with that move, didn't they? They left the poor man with nothing but an easy path with which to make a fool of himself with.

Similarly, Mr. Karl wanted to get rid of J.R. Smith, whereas the owner and the general managers said no way Jose and gave him a very good contract and pretty much every dollar that Smith could have received if he were starting for another team rather than being vindictively prevented from starting by Mr. Karl.

Yet another example of a big difference between Mr. Karl and Nuggets management would be that management was always much more keen on Nene and less keen on Marcus Camby than was Mr. Karl. Until this year, Nene could get good playing time from Mr. Karl only if either Kenyon Martin or Marcus Camby were not available. Were Karl in charge of the dismantling of the Nuggets, he would have gone out of his way to try to keep Marcus Camby.

So for a franchise that worships Mr. Karl, they have not allowed him to share in the management moves anywhere near as much as you would think.




BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Denver Nuggets Real Player Ratings as of January 15 2009

The Quest is proud to announce to you that the second major improvement to Real Player Ratings (RPR) in less than half a year is now fully up and running. We are now certain that RPR is the best overall rating system in existence, and that it is now roughly as good as it will ever or can ever be.

I recently developed a statistically valid way to rate the defending of players, that is, what they do to prevent scores other than rebounding, blocks, steals, and fouls, which were always included. Although the technique used had to be indirect and inexact, it validly awards the better defenders with bigger RPR bonuses. It has been validated by comparing results obtained with the defensive ratings shown on three different "advanced basketball statistics" web sites. My results were shown to be highly correlated with the results shown on the other sites. And where there is any difference, I honestly believe mine are better.

Point Guard Chauncey Billups is so far the most valuable Nugget, and by a considerable margin, in the 2008-09 regular season.

DENVER NUGGETS
REAL PLAYER RATINGS
[QUALITY OF PLAYERS]
2008-09 Regular Season
As of Jan. 15, 2009

Chauncey Billups† 0.909
Nene Hilario 0.845
Renaldo Balkman 0.830
Carmelo Anthony 0.821
J.R. Smith 0.787
Chris Andersen 0.763
Kenyon Martin 0.744
Anthony Carter 0.637
Linas Kleiza 0.552
Dahntay Jones 0.455

SCALE FOR REAL PLAYER RATINGS FOR A SEASON
Perfect Player? Is there Such a Thing? 1.000 and more
Historic Super Star 0.950 and more
Super Star 0.850 0.949
A Star Player; An Outstanding, Above Average Starter 0.775 0.849
A Very Good Player; A Solid Starter 0.700 0.774
Major Role Player 0.650 0.699
Role Player 0.600 0.649
Minor Role Player 0.550 0.599
Very Minor or Marginal Role Player 0.500 0.549
Poor Player at This Time 0.450 0.499
Very Poor Player at This Time 0.350 0.449
Extremely Poor Player at This Time / Disaster and less 0.349

Real Player Production (RPP) is the sum of all the good things minus the sum of all the bad things a player has done since the season began. There is no methodology as of yet for adjusting RPP for defending. Therefore, you should, in order to fairly evaluate the following ratings, remember that the better defenders have done more for the team relative to the lessor defenders than the ratings are showing.

DEMVER NUGGETS
REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION
[QUANTITY OF PLAYERS]
2008-09 Regular Season
Through Jan. 15, 2009

Chauncey Billups† 990.75
Nene Hilario 920.10
Carmelo Anthony 793.75
Kenyon Martin 754.20
J.R. Smith 634.45
Anthony Carter 512.90
Linas Kleiza 439.45
Chris Andersen 346.40
Dahntay Jones 255.90
Renaldo Balkman 207.90

CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE USER GUIDE FOR REAL PLAYER RATINGS BY TEAM, last updated Jan. 13, 2009

Congratulations and respect are due to CHAUNCEY BILLUPS who has been leading the Nuggets in quality basketball so far this season. At the same time, BILLUPS also leads the Nuggets in terms of total net contributions so far this season. So there is clearly only one Nuggets MVP, and that is CHAUNCEY BILLUPS.













































OTHER NUGGETS STARS OF 2008-09
NENE


























RENALDO BALKMAN





















CARMELO ANTHONY






































J.R. SMITH





















CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE USER GUIDE FOR REAL PLAYER RATINGS BY TEAM, last updated Jan. 13, 2009



BallHype: hype it up!






You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Monday, January 19, 2009

Free Advertising Program for the Depression

Today I rewrote the link exchange section of the User Guide, and I added into the Guide a new Free Advertising Program. This is how those parts of the User Guide read as of now:

WHY NOT EXCHANGE LINKS WITH THE QUEST?
You can link to the Quest site with no permission needed. To link to this site, copy and paste the code below into your site. Thanks, and you can email nuggetsone@gmail.com with your site address, and we will link back. Your link will go in the right column in the same area where the other already existing such links are. You may wish to, for convenience, use the following code when you construct the link.


The Quest for the Ring
FREE ADVERTISING PROGRAM
The depression, or recession, or great heist, or whatever it is, means that we should work together, or else we will sink together. Therefore, the Quest is offerring free display advertising on this site until at least June 30, 2010. The program is for anyone who has a basketball related product or service. If the free program is not extended beyond that date, we will be offerring advertising at extremely low rates. The free display ad program is currently limited to four advertisers, on a first come first serve basis. Each advertiser gets 6 months free though if we think your product or service is especially important we will extend that indefinitely.

This program is not for large corporations; it is intended for small enterprises, especially newer ones. Nor is this program for those already affiliated with a major internet commercial site, such as ebay.

To advertise for free, email a request giving your web address and some basic information about your product or service. If you get approved, we will email you back. You will be approved unless you don't really have a basketball product or service, or unless you are a big company, or unless you are already getting a large amount of traffic. After you are approved, you can email your ad. Your ad should be sized to fit either in the User Guide or the right column. For User Guide ads, the width should be close to but nor more than 675px. The height should be 100px maximum. For sidebar ads, the maximum size is 240px by 240 px. We will even make a simple but nice looking ad for you if you want.

The email address to use is nuggets1nuggets@gmail.com



BallHype: hype it up!








You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Friday, January 16, 2009

Fifty Ways to Win on the Cheap

A 1970’s pop song by Paul Simon claimed that there must be fifty ways to leave your lover. Similarly, there must be at least fifty ways to win on the cheap (or with the extra effort, for those wearing the rose colored glasses) in basketball, if you were to count them all, right? But who would have thought that you would have a team demonstrating a large percentage of those fifty ways all in the same season? Why it’s none other than the Denver Nuggets demonstrating many of the fifty ways, and thereby showing how you turn a partial dismantling due to an economics emergency into the ultimate rose colored glasses season.

Consider the latest ways to win cheap (or with extra energy, if you have the rose specs on) in the regular season, demonstrated by the Nuggets.

With the score tied and with only a couple of seconds left in the January 13 Dallas Mavericks-Denver Nuggets game in Denver, Chauncey Billups threw his leg out while going up for a shot, which was supposed to be a no call or an offensive foul according to NBA publicly announced foul guidelines, yet Dallas was called for the foul and the Billups free throws "won" the game for Denver. It was supposed to be an overtime game.

Mark Cuban, the owner of the Mavericks, was in attendance, and he was annoyed enough to throw a little tantrum and to probably earn himself another fine from the ultra sensitive League officials, that would go along with several previous fines. As for everyday Mavericks fans, while they knew that the Mavericks had been cheated in this game, they were not really all that upset, because they are very, very pessimistic about their team’s chances this year anyway.

From the Official NBA Rules Number 12:
Fouls and Penalties, Part B, Section 1, Clause a: “A player, including even Chauncey Billups, shall not hold, push, charge into, impede the progress of an opponent by extending a hand, forearm, leg or knee or by bending the body into a posi-tion that is not normal. Contact that results in the re-routing of an opponent is a foul which must be called immediately. “


In the very next game, the January 15 Phoenix Suns-Denver Nuggets game in Denver, with the score tied and only a handful of seconds left, the Suns' Grant Hill, isolated on an out of position Dahntay Jones, made a great crossover move into the paint, and the beaten Jones intentionally put his foot way out and tripped Hill to the floor. Why wouldn't Dahntay Jones trip Grant Hill, given that in this rose colored glasses season Denver is trying to win at all costs including at the cost of breaking the rules? Phoenix wins when Grant Hill makes either one or two free throws right? Wrong. The referees failed to make the call and so Grant Hill was not given any free throws!

Remember, this is now the ultimate rose colored glasses team in the ultimate rose colored glasses season. So Denver must win, because those glasses are apparently not only rose, but they are also magic. So Denver, with even greater altitude and attitude advantages in any “5th quarter,” goes on to win in overtime.

Although Dahntay and the Nuggets were bailed out at the end, the Suns’ Matt Barnes and Amare Stoudemire, the latter being one of the top ten players in the NBA, were in severe foul trouble all night long. It’s not as if the refs were not calling fouls. The Suns ended up with 30 personal fouls called against them and the Nuggets had 28 called against them. As usual, Nene was in foul trouble for much of the night, joined in this case by J.R. Smith.

Earlier in the Phoenix game, Anthony Carter all but tackled Grant Hill to the ground on a breakaway, and was given a flagrant one foul for that little burst of extra energy.

At this rate, roughly 1/4 of Denver’s wins will be under protest and League investigation by the end of the season.

Incidentally, did you know that Grant Hill is 36 years old now? I don’t know about you, but that makes me feel kind of old.

So this year’s Nuggets have been getting regular season wins with every known and some previously unknown regular season low rent ploys, methods, strategies, and stunts. On offense they have been fast pacing, fast breaking, and fast charging the rim, so as to win a lot of style points and foul calls from the refs, who always and I do mean always call a regular season game in favor of the team that appears to be more aggressive and energetic. The refs are, unconsciously, like "Wow, look at these guys charging around like this. It may be kind of helter skelter, but you have to love the enthusiasm. Let's make sure they get more than their share of calls."

However, in the great majority of playoff games, the referees, who are in that part of the year only the most veteran, traditional, and conventional referees that the League employs, are not so easily persuaded to play favorites due to aggression and energy per se. Assuming they are not paid off, which with any luck we can, the playoff referees can be expected to be neutral under all circumstances, and to remember that there is nothing in the NBA rules regarding the more energetic and aggressive team earning some unfair calls in it’s favor. To the contrary, the idea behind the foul rules is to penalize an overly aggressive team, not to reward it. It’s just that too often the concept gets a little twisted in a little regular season game.

In parallel to their offense, on defense the Nuggets have been goal tending to beat the band, fouling like fouling is going out of style, and depending on the refs to overlook a few of their fouls. When you consider both ends of the court combined, all of a sudden the Nuggets have become one of the best regular season referee milkers in years. Amazingly, Jerry Sloan and Greg Popovich look like pikers compared with George Karl so far this year as far as taking advantage of the foul rules, the sympathies, and the missed calls of the referees.

As to how the Nuggets are approaching the game this year, you might say that the Nuggets are playing every game as if it is the playoffs, and catching opponent after opponent off guard with what for the regular season is an abnormal amount of aggressiveness and energy. Would someone who has the address please email Nuggets headquarters and remind them that the playoffs do not start until April, and that it looks kind of funny for a team to be wearing itself out and risking a lot of injuries by playing at full out intensity in January.

The Nuggets have gone from being very fast, athletic, and talented in recent years to being fast, energetic, and aggressive this year. Well, since when you lose Eduardo Najera, Marcus Camby, and Allen Iverson in a few months time and pick up far less expensive players, you have lost a whole heap of athleticism and talent, to the point where you can forget about winning with athleticism and talent any more. So you have to credit the Nuggets for being realistic and logical, anyway.

Another factor producing win after win after win is the high altitude of the Nuggets' home court. This is something I have always tried to downplay, since athletes are supposed to be so physically fit, but it is now an inescapable fact that the Nuggets are milking the high altitude of their home court as much as possible. Their lungs are used to the thinner air, whereas the lungs of their opponents are not. By the 4th quarter of games in Denver, the Nuggets are still charging around like there is no tomorrow, whereas the opponent is huffing and puffing more and more. So the Nuggets are milking the high altitude thin air advantage for every extra steal, extra fast break, and extra foul draw they can get.

Could it be that even the referees are running short of oxygen needed, for example, to observe that Grant Hill was tripped by Dahntay Jones? Who can say for sure? Maybe, ironically, there is more truth underneath this sarcasm than I thought, and the referees actually do need more oxygen in order to think straight in Denver.

Basketball media people do not know what to make of all of these Denver wins, and they are mildly annoyed by the whole thing and hoping it goes away. No one (other than dedicated Nuggets fans) wants to see this particular version of the Denver Nuggets in the Western Conference Finals. Were that to happen, the Nuggets would be demolished by the Lakers even more thoroughly than they were last year, which would make for one ridiculous West final.

But since I have been “specializing” in the Nuggets, so I have been forced to report on all of this. And I have been forced to admit that I was completely wrong in predicting that the Nuggets would win about 40 games or even fewer this season. I guess the moral of that story if you are a basketball writer is: “Always wait to see whether a team gets a player with a name like “The Bird Man” before you write them off. If a team gets a player with a name like Bird Man, refrain from making any predictions. Laugh out loud.

But could Denver keep tapping into the Fifty Ways to Win on the Cheap to win a playoff series? No, because these ways generally only work in the regular season, against a team that is not necessarily ready to match energy and aggression levels. As I have been explaining in recent articles, most all of these methods and strategies the Nuggets are choosing (and while they are choosing very wisely, they are choosing from among a limited set of options) are ultimately relatively low payoff methods and strategies when it comes to a best of seven series.

Moreover, the other team in a playoff series is not simply going to play the role of punching bag for Denver and thereby waste all of their athleticism and talent. Rather, the other team in that series will ramp up their own energy and aggressiveness so as to keep Denver's fast break and "referee points" within reason. Meanwhile, the other team will be able to draw on advantages, and often large advantages, in things such as shooting, passing, assisting, offensive rebounding, coaching, playoff experience, and probably more than even these things although these things alone are already more than enough to win the series.

The Nuggets can be as energetic, aggressive, and flashy as they want in the regular season, but for the playoffs they are lacking many basic things. They don't have enough veteran big men, and they are short at least one good rebounder. The guards and guard-forwards other than Chauncey Billups do not have anywhere near enough confidence or consistency on offense. They do not have a dependable 3-point game unless both J.R. Smith and Linas Kleiza can become dependable by April. They only have one true playmaker (Billups) although theoretically J.R. Smith and Anthony Carter might count as ½ each. (J.R. Smith has been making a lot of plays lately.)

Probably the biggest thing the Nuggets don’t have is the “take the team on the back guy”. After George Karl decided to downsize Carmelo Anthony, and after he agreed to be downsized, because he is so, well, mellow, the Nuggets, unlike most of the other playoff teams, have no “go to” player who can, if he is on fire, and if the rest of the team is dragging, by himself score enough points to make up for the ones having the off game and change a loss into a win. Carmelo Anthony is at this moment less like players such as LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Kobe Bryant, and even Tracy McGrady than ever before, thanks to Mr. Karl, who has for some perverse reason been trying to downsize Melo offensively ever since he arrived at Nuggets headquarters.

Well, now you know some ways to win in basketball if you are a less talented and less skilled team than your opponent. Be aggressive and energetic enough to get the referees looking out for your best interests! But don't be too aggressive, because obviously if the referees decide you are too aggressive they will go against you. It’s a fine line you are walking. And don’t blame me or expect this formula to work if you get to the State finals or something.

As for the Nuggets, they should enjoy the regular season as much as possible, because in a best of seven series, the other team will know all about just about everything I have discussed. They will know about everything that Denver has been doing, and they will be ready to deal with it. They will come correct, with athleticism and talent that Denver does not have. They will come and defeat the Nuggets.


BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Ultimate Game Breakdown: Players: Trailblazers 84 Pistons 83 in Portland Jan. 7 2009

REAL PLAYER RATINGS (QUALITY) FOR THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUALITY
Tayshaun Prince, SF 0.952
Antonio McDyess, PF 0.630
Kwame Brown, C 0.566
Amir Johnson, PF 0.521
Rodney Stuckey, PG 0.320
Arron Afflalo, SG 0.279
Jason Maxiell, PF 0.234
Allen Iverson, SG 0.224

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS QUALITY
Jerryd Bayless, PG 0.744
Rudy Fernandez, SG 0.732
Steve Blake, PG 0.704
LaMarcus Aldridge, PF 0.626
Travis Outlaw, SF 0.544
Joel Przybilla, C 0.362
Nicolas Batum, SF 0.340
Sergio Rodriguez, PG 0.233
Greg Oden, C 0.100

SCALE FOR RPR (QUALITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
Historic Superstar for this game 1.300 and more
Superstar 1.025 1.299
Star 0.825 1.024
Very Good 0.675 0.824
Major Role Player 0.550 0.674
Role Player 0.475 0.549
Minor Role Player 0.425 0.474
Very Minor Role Player or Very Important Defender 0.350 0.424
Poor Game or Extremely Importand Defender 0.275 0.349
Very Poor Game Regardless of Defending 0.200 0.274
Disaster Game Regardless of Defending and less 0.199

****************************************************
REAL PLAYER PRODUCTION (QUANTITY) IN THIS GAME
DETROIT PISTONS QUANTITY
Tayshaun Prince, SF 41.90
Kwame Brown, C 18.10
Antonio McDyess, PF 17.65
Rodney Stuckey, PG 12.80
Allen Iverson, SG 9.85
Amir Johnson, PF 8.85
Jason Maxiell, PF 3.75
Arron Afflalo, SG 3.35

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS QUANTITY
LaMarcus Aldridge, PF 27.55
Steve Blake, PG 23.95
Rudy Fernandez, SG 22.70
Travis Outlaw, SF 18.50
Jerryd Bayless, PG 12.65
Joel Przybilla, C 10.85
Nicolas Batum, SF 6.80
Sergio Rodriguez, PG 3.50
Greg Oden, C 1.30

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Players Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 40.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 36.0 to 39.9
Huge Game 32.0 to 35.9
Very Big Game 28.0 to 31.9
Big Game 24.0 to 27.9
Typical Average Game 20.0 to 23.9
Somewhat Below Average Game 16.0 to 19.9
Way Below Average Game 12.0 to 15.9
Bad Game 9.0 to 11.9
Really Bad Game 5.0 to 8.9
Total Disaster minus infinity to 4.9

SCALE FOR RPP (QUANTITY) RATINGS FOR A SINGLE GAME
FOR NON-STARTING PLAYERS
Only Some Non-Starters Can Ever Fly This High, but Not Very Often! 33.0 and more
Massive and Memorable Game 29.0 to 32.9
Huge Game 25.0 to 28.9
Very Big Game 21.0 to 24.9
Big Game 17.0 to 20.9
Typical Non-Starter Game 12.0 to 16.9
Below Average Even For a Non-Starter 9.0 to 11.9
Way Below Average Even For a Non-Starter or Limited Minutes 6.0 to 8.9
Bad Game Even for a Non-Starter or Very Limited Minutes 3.0 to 5.9
Disaster: Nothing Much to Report minus infinity to 1.9

THE HIGHEST QUALITY PLAYERS IN THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
SuperStar during minutes on the court: Tayshaun Prince
Very Good during minutes on the court: Antonio McDyess
Very Good during minutes on the court: Kwame Brown
Very Good during minutes on the court: Amir Johnson








PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS OUTSTANDING QUALITY GAMES
Star during minutes on the court: Jerryd Bayless
Star during minutes on the court: Rudy Fernandez
Very Good during minutes on the court: Steve Blake
Very Good during minutes on the court: LaMarcus Aldridge
Very Good during minutes on the court: Travis Outlaw

THE GREATEST POWER PERFORMERS OF THIS GAME













DETROIT PISTONS POWER PERFORMERS
Only Some Players Can Ever Fly This High, and Not Very Often: Tayshaun Prince
Big Game: Antonio McDyess








PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS POWER PERFORMERS
Very Big Game: LaMarcus Aldridge
Very Big Game: Travis Outlaw
Big Game: Steve Blake
Big Game: Rudy Fernandez

USER GUIDE FOR ULTIMATE GAME BREAKDOWN: PLAYER REPORTS (Last updated December 8 2008)

This is a "just the important facts please, and give them to me quick" type of report. I will in some cases do a very limited amount of commentary at the bottom of this type of report, but it will really be just notes for commentary that will be elsewhere in the near future.

In many cases there will be no comments at all. Most of the commentaries I do are in "Game/Team/League Reports" and in Fast Breaks".

With an Ultimate Game Breakdown-Players report, you can see very rapidly who was most responsible for the winning or the losing of the game. Then someone, including me, can easily write a separate game report which explains how things might have worked out better for a team, or why things worked out just about as well as possible, as the case may be.

Only players who played at least 7 minutes are included in these reports. Any player who plays for only one half of one quarter (6 minutes) or less is not included since he didn't play for long enough to be fairly compared with the other players.

The Real Player Ratings formula has been very carefully and accurately tweaked again and is currently as follows:

POSITIVE FACTORS
Points 1.00 (at par)
Number of 3-Pt FGs Made 1.00
Number of 2-Pt FGs Made 0.60
Number of FTs Made 0.00

Assists 1.75

Offensive Rebounds 1.15
Defensive Rebounds 1.25
Blocks 1.60
Steals 2.15

NEGATIVE FACTORS
3-Pt FGs Missed -1.00
2-Pt FGs Missed -0.85
FTs Missed -0.85

Turnovers -2.00
Personal Fouls -0.80

ACTUAL COMBINED AWARD OR PENALTY BY TYPE OF SHOT
3-Pointer Made 4.00
2-Pointer Made 2.60
Free Throw Made 1.00
3-Pointer Missed -1.00
2-Pointer Missed -0.85
Free Throw Missed -0.85

ZERO POINTS: PERCENTAGES BELOW WHICH THERE IS A NEGATIVE NET RESULT
3-Pointer 0 score % 0.200
2-Pointer 0 score % 0.246
1-Pointer 0 score % 0.459

ASSISTS VERSUS TURNOVERS ZERO POINT
Assist/Turnover Ratio That Yields 0 Net Points: 1.143

QUALITY (RPR) AND QUANTITY (RPP)
RPR game reports show for each player the RPR (Real Player Rating) which tells you how good a player did (all the good things minus all the bad things) out on the court per unit of time. The RPP (Real Player Production) report tells you how much in total (the sum of the of the good things minus the sum of the bad things) a player did out on the court, without regard to playing time.

Many and maybe most sports watchers and an unknown but probably disturbingly large number of sports managers make the mistakes of exaggerating the importance of quantity and overlooking to some extent quality. These reports allow you to expand your horizons. These reports put quantity and quality side by side, which is extremely valuable, because both are roughly equally important in explaining accurately why and how the game turned out the way it did.

Players who over many games consistently have higher RPR (quality) but lower RPP (quantity) results are in many cases not getting enough playing time. Players that over many games consistently have lower RPR (quality) but higher RPP (quantity) results are in many cases getting too much playing time.

The exceptional cases are very often going to be players who are either truly outstanding defenders or truly bad defenders. This is because the one and only thing that is not counted, because it is impossible to calculate it, is the number of shots that a player prevents from being scores. Investigation has to date revealed that, apparently, no one has even attempted, for the NBA, rough estimates of the actual value of each player's defending, in terms of number or percentage of scores prevented, or in terms of number or percentage of possessions made worthless.

Over the coming year, I am going to be working to see if it is possible to use some combination of advanced statistics that are tracked on certain internet sites as an accurate proxy for the number of shots and/or for the number of possessions ruined by a defender.

Another exception. where it is really alright when it looks like a player is playing too much, will be if a team has a point guard who has many more turnovers than the average point guard has. Because the point guard is so important, a good coach has to play his best guard who can make plays at the position for a full set of minutes every game, pretty much regardless of how many turnovers that player makes. If you take out your designated point guard due to "too many turnovers," it's most often going to be sort of like cutting your foot off because you have a bad case of athletes foot!


BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here