This is the Quest for the Ring Express Version, consisiting of all Reports in the traditional blog format and virtually no features on an extremely fast loading page.

You may prefer the main home page, which is chock loaded with features. The home page takes 15-20 seconds to load if you have a fast connection and longer than that if you have a slow connection.
THE QUEST FOR THE RING PRIMARY HOME PAGE (Loaded with features)

Thursday, February 12, 2009

To Win the Quest, You Have to be in "The Zone," You Have to be Like Fitz

The Zone is where you have left the everyday regular season concerns behind and you are now, as a super athlete, attempting to go where no one else can go. You are attempting to win playoff games and the Championship. Actually, it's much more than the regular season that you are above and beyond: it's everything. You have risen above everything, including your coaches, your past, the regular season, everything. Everything other than winning in the playoffs is in the distance in the rear view mirror. It's just you and the ring and you can practically touch it.

In this year's Super Bowl, Larry Fitzgerald, NFL pro bowl wide receiver of the Arizona Cardinals was in "The Zone."

Larry Jr. and quarterback Kurt Warner have led that organization from a bumpy 9-7 regular season to three postseason upsets over Atlanta, Carolina and Philadelphia. Fitzgerald has 23 catches for 419 yards and five touchdowns, each seeming to top the one before in degree of difficulty.

Fitzgerald already has broken San Francisco 49ers legend Jerry Rice's record for receiving yards in a postseason. He tied Rice, Los Angeles Rams Hall of Famer Tom Fears and Randy Moss with an NFL-record three consecutive postseason games of at least 100 yards receiving. Moss achieved the feat in January 2000 and '01 with the Vikings.

"Larry is in a zone right now that we've rarely ever seen for a receiver," said former Vikings receiver Cris Carter, a mentor to Fitzgerald since the latter was a Vikings ballboy. "He and Randy Moss have the best ball skills of any receivers I've ever seen. Their ability to stretch the defense -- Randy with his speed down the field and Larry with his ability to go vertical and get the ball -- put them in a rare category of players the NFL has ever seen."


And:

"To be considered a great player, it's mandatory -- mandatory -- that you win big football games," Fitzgerald said last month. 'I'm not talking about regular-season games and putting up big numbers. At the end of the day, that's all nice and everything, but it's only a footnote in the media guide. 'What matters is winning big playoff games consistently. You have to be your greatest in the biggest moments.


That's what I'm talking about. Put that quote up on your wall. Unlike for example George Karl and Carmelo Anthony, there is no desire or by default tendency to leech off the regular season in this guy's soul.

George Karl and Carmelo Anthony are not like Fitz at all. That's why they have not ever and won't this year win in the playoffs this year.

Like Larry Fitzgerald is how you need to be if you are an exceptional athlete, not like Carmelo Anthony. You need to be 100% humble about and completely above details about the regular season. You need to be focused on winning in the playoffs 24/7 and 365 days a year. And if your team can't make the playoffs anytime soon, you need to find another team that will be in the playoffs.

Keep tellin' 'em and showin' 'em about sports, Larry. In the Quest for the Ring, you need to be like Fitz.

Full Article
Related Quest Report

Larry Fitzgerald Official Site

Larry Fitzgerald at the NFL Player's Association

Larry Fitzgerald at Wikipedia




BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Monday, February 9, 2009

Fast Break: Purpose, Pride, and Personnel Needed at the Same Time, on Offense and Defense

The Nuggets are about 17-2 against losing teams now, the best record against sub .500 teams in the League, which is the number one reason why their record is so spectacular. But those teams don't play in the playoffs, so big deal.

Here's another way of looking at how this franchise has fallen short. For several years, through and including last year, the Nuggets had this massively huge payroll, chock loaded with players who could come up big in the playoffs, but George Karl just sat on his behind during all the games, and he just let Allen Iverson run around and around and around to nowhere, with no and I mean absolutely no team concept.

Now fast forward to now. They have Nene coming from nowhere to be more or less a superstar. They have Billups coming from Detroit to be almost or perhaps actually a superstar. Most surprising of all, they have several obscure, low cost players, several of whom are playing just about half again as much better than they ever did before. And they have all of these assets while playing with a purpose and as a team. At least on defense, anyway.

George Karl, the ultimate "contrary indicator," the ultimate wrong place, wrong time type of guy, is up from his bench perch far more than last year, jawing the refs and much more actively coaching the team than when they had the expensive, playoff-level players. Oh well, I guess Mr Karl thinks that last year's Nuggets should have coached themselves.

Even these days, though, the Nuggets are largely one dimensional; their purpose or system, and their team concept, is really on defense only. On offense, they have the fast break concept, the drive to the hoop over and over again and make free throws concept, the Chauncey Billups directing concept, and the Nene stuffing a bunch concept, and that is about it. Unfortunately, the sum total of all of those is still too weak to set up a winning offense for the playoffs. Collectively these things are not enough. Individually, these things are more or less low return investments by nature, and/or because these things can be relatively easily countered in the playoffs.

For example, the fast break is notoriously easy to contain in the playoffs. Even more importantly, the fast break and the other offensive things the Nuggets are doing would not be very good payoff strategies even if the opponent could not contain them in the series.

The franchise continues to either not believe in or to be unable to implement any kind of real, hard to defend offensive strategy. The tactics of Chauncey Billups and the dunks and layups of Nene can only get you so far, especially when you consider that the opponent in the playoff series is going to be quite aware that all they have to do to contain the Nuggets is to hassle Nene close in and hassle Chauncey out on the perimeter.

As for the unofficial, quasi coaching of Chauncey Billups, one basketball player, even him, does not add up to a system , strategy, or a purpose. And since when is Billups qualified to coach a professional NBA team, anyway?

So the bottom line is that the Nuggets have a working, effective strategy and a purpose only on defense, while they still have a combination of insufficient strategies and anarchy on offense. And they no longer have enough playoff-experienced, talented players needed to dependably win a playoff series. So overall, they still do not have enough going for them to be able to win a playoff series.

Defensively, last year there were almost as many defensive specialists as this year, but their teammates, including Carmelo Anthony, were not playing very much defense, because their was no real team objective or team pride for that. Mr. Karl tried early on to get this but he was not able to maintain it over the course of the season. Remember Yakhouba Diawara, (now on the Heat)? Remember Eduardo Najera (Nets)? Remember Marcus Camby (Clippers)? And if they wanted to play like they are this year, they sure as hell didn't need Allen Iverson, so, remember Reggie Evans (traded to the Sixers for Iverson)? If they had Evans' heavy rebounding right now, they would be able to just about truthfully say they don't miss Camby on defense.

Another way the Nuggets could more than offset Camby would be if, god forbid, Renaldo Balkman gets more minutes and Dahntay Jones gets fewer.

These defensive specialists were like lone wolves, since the rest of the team was not sold on playing good defense. Just as bad, the defensive specialists were often totally out of the flow offensively. Poor Diawara, who has a decent three, had games where he played 20 minutes or so and hardly got the ball at all, even though the Nuggets were deficient in 3-point shooting!

So the Nuggets had defensive specialists last year just as they do this year, but they never used them in a coordinated way with the other players as they are doing this year.

In the recent years, the last two anyway, the Nuggets had more than enough offensive playoff talent, but virtually no playoff game wins was the result of not tying the team together and making defense a point of pride, and of having an offense that was more or less anarchy.

So now they have changed their stripes and have the team defense but they are still mostly lost offensively. And even defensively, they are in for some rude awakenings when their defensive specialists, most of whom have little or no playoff experience, play against quality offensive teams and quality coaches, and when they face referees who have seen all the inferior, rule shaving strategies before and twice on Sundays.

If you are a good coach and you encounter a team playing like the Nuggets are, you instruct your players to get physical right back on them, both off the ball and on the ball. Not only because you don't want to end up intimidated but, more importantly, you want to force the referees to get control of the game and, more specifically, to get control of the Nuggets.

In the unlikely event that the playoff referees need some persuasion to keep control of the playoff game, this is what Adelman or Sloan or Scott or whoever will do: they will instruct their players to get as rough as necessary until the referees are forced to take control and call a tighter game.

Judging from all the changes they have made from last year to this, the Nuggets are infuriatingly inconsistent in what they do, but they are consistent insofar as they are never doing enough to set up winning in the playoffs. The Nuggets simply don't do enough. Unlike top franchises such as the Lakers and the Celtics, the Nuggets seem to not understand that there is no legal limit on how many strategies you can have, or on how powerful and hard to counter they can be.

Last year, the Nuggets had the players who could win some playoff games, which is probably the most difficult to achieve prerequisite. They squandered it, because they had almost nothing in the way of coaching, offensive strategy, offensive purpose and pride, or defensive purpose and pride. So in the April 2008 series against the Lakers, George Karl was reduced to pleading with his players to pass more since, amazingly, there really wasn't any point guard! I am not exaggerating.

This year, between Karl doing a little actual game coaching work, Chauncey directing things, the consistent fast breaking on offense, the relentless driving to the hoop and free throw shooting, and especially the high intensity, hard charging defense as a defensive system, the Nuggets overall have to some extent a team strategy and purpose going. But alas, they no longer have the players who will be able to win playoff games, and they are still coming up short in terms of the quality and power of their offensive strategy. It has been a few steps forward and a few steps back, with no real increase in the ability to win a playoff series.

Denver: you have to have several powerful strategies going at once to be able to win in the playoffs, not just rotate in and out over the years one or two powerful strategies and a bunch of weak strategies.

The playoff referees are going to slap this team down if they come in thinking they are going to milk the refs and foul and get fouled their way to winning playoff games. And no team will be a punching bag for the Nuggets' high intensity defending. Playoff teams are not going to permit either Nene or Chauncey to drop 25-30 points on them in more than a game or two. They are going to make sure that Carmelo Anthony and J.R. Smith remain in their boxes most of the time. So in short they are going to know how to defeat the Nuggets in the playoffs.



BallHype: hype it up!







You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Fast Break: Laugh Out Loud George Karl! He Thinks the Nuggets Can Defeat the Lakers in the Playoffs!

Maybe not tor you but Mr. George Karl is often really funny to me. Last year, he was openly unconfident about his team, and now this year, he is claiming in public, not just in the locker room as a private confidence booster, that the Nuggets can beat the Lakers in a playoff series this spring:

It's Saturday Night Live with George Karl!

In my opinion there is one and only one team that has a remote chance of upsetting the Lakers for the Western crown: the Hornets. Maybe there is a 1/250 chance of that, and it would have to be something that came about due to at least a couple of Lakers' injuries. At the beginning of the season, I was thinking the Rockets might have a chance to upset LA too, but it's just one injury after another for them, so I don't see how it's possible anymore.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Saturday, February 7, 2009

How the 2008-09 Denver Nuggets Players Rate as Defenders

A NEW AND POWERFUL SYSTEM TO FIND OUT ABOUT DEFENDING
In the last year and especially in the last month, big strides have been made in my being able to accurately and fairly compare and contrast players with respect to defending. A few weeks ago, I introduced the Defending Adjustment for Real Player Ratings (RPR). Due to additional evolution and expansion of intentions, I am now adding the word "hidden" on the front end of the term, and am changing the last word from "adjustment" to "rating," so it is now "Hidden Defending Rating" (HDR).

RPR is the per unit of time combined total of all positive things tracked, minus all negative things tracked, plus the Hidden Defending Rating. The HDR is of course like RPR a per unit of time rating.

For very detailed information about how Real Player Ratings were developed and are calculated, including the adjustment for hidden defending, please consult the User Guide for Real Player Rating Reports by Team

What follows is some highlights of the User Guide. Normally we won't put any User Guide material in reports, but one exception will be when we are rolling out a new type of report or a new performance measure, as is the case here.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF USER GUIDE FOR DEFENDING ADJUSTMENTS TO REAL PLAYER RATINGS
Aside from the hidden there would be unhidden defending, which would be rebounding plus steals plus blocks minus personal fouls. If we extract the combination of those four out of the same counts that underlie the RPR as a whole, we get what we are going to call the Scored Defending Contribution. This could also be thought of as Tracked Defending Contribution if you prefer. Then if we divide this by minutes, we can have a Scored (or Tracked) Defending Rating.

Finally, if we combine Hidden Defending Rating (HDR) with Scored Defending Rating (SDR) we can have an Overall Defending Rating (ODR). I am for now going to simply multiply the HDR by two and add that to the SDR to yield the ODR. To combine them this way is more arbitrary than my usual standards allow; I am doing this because there is as of yet no non-arbitrary way of doing it. The formula of two times HDR plus SDR brings HDR almost up to par with SDR in terms of the actual numbers and the averages of those numbers involved.

In other words, I am saying for now that hidden defending is almost as important as scored defending. There appear to be many coaches and not a few hardcore basketball fans who believe that hidden defending is actually more important than scored defending, but I am very likely never going to agree with that. I think that although hidden defending is important, and plausibly almost as important as tracked defending, that it is like a quicksand in that there seems to be a tendency for a substantial minority of basketball people to get carried away with estimating the importance of it and then become more and more trapped by their error in terms of how they look at basketball or in terms of how they coach their team if they are coaching.

Exactly what is hidden defending? It's every action that helps to prevent the other team from scoring other than rebounding, stealing, and blocking. So it would include man to man defending, zone defending, rotating in general, defensive recognition, and quick defensive response to various offensive tactics, such as pick and rolls. Obviously, if a defender is good at these things, the other team doesn't score as many points than if the defender is lousy.

================================================
DENVER NUGGETS 2008-09 DEFENDERS COMPARED AND CONTRASTED

DENVER NUGGETS HIDDEN DEFENDING RATINGS
Includes Man to Man Defending, Zone Defending, Defensive Recognition and Response, Rotation, Pick and Roll Defending, all other untracked defensive actions
NUGGETS 2008-09 REGULAR SEASON
THROUGH JAN. 20 2009

Renaldo Balkman 0.173
J.R. Smith 0.128
Dahntay Jones 0.106
Chauncey Billups 0.103
Nene Hilario 0.092
Carmelo Anthony 0.070
Kenyon Martin 0.066
Anthony Carter 0.054
Chris Andersen 0.048
Linas Kleiza 0.041

DENVER NUGGETS SCORED (TRACKED) DEFENDING RATINGS
Rebounding, Blocking, and Stealing Less Fouling per unit of Time
NUGGETS 2008-09 REGULAR SEASON
THROUGH JAN. 20 2009

Chris Andersen 0.374
Kenyon Martin 0.282
Nene Hilario 0.267
Renaldo Balkman 0.205
Carmelo Anthony 0.205
J.R. Smith 0.190
Anthony Carter 0.185
Linas Kleiza 0.142
Chauncey Billups 0.131
Dahntay Jones 0.080

DENVER NUGGETS OVERALL DEFENDING RATINGS
Two Times the Hidden Defending Rating Plus the Scored Defending Rating, a relatively arbitrary but still roughly accurate and revealing performance measure. Note, the two components of the ODR are part of RPR, but not the measure itself.
NUGGETS 2008-09 REGULAR SEASON
THROUGH JAN. 20 2009

Renaldo Balkman 0.551
Chris Andersen 0.469
Nene Hilario 0.451
J.R. Smith 0.445
Kenyon Martin 0.413
Carmelo Anthony 0.345
Chauncey Billups 0.338
Anthony Carter 0.294
Dahntay Jones 0.292
Linas Kleiza 0.225

For very detailed information about how Real Player Ratings were developed and are calculated, including the adjustment for hidden defending, please consult the User Guide for Real Player Rating Reports by Team

The first thing that jumps out here is how Renaldo Balkman has been one of the best defenders in the NBA. Were he to start, his rating would go down due to playing against better offensive players, but it is clear that it is virtually impossible that his rating would drop below outstanding were he to start.

The next thing that jumps out is that J.R. Smith, who thanks partly to George Karl and partly to his own playing in the past, has a terrible defending reputation, is listed as the fourth best defensive stopper on the Nuggets! How could this be? Thats's fairly easy; there are two main reasons. First, because since Smith does not start, he is often in the game against inferior offensive players. Second, Smith was never as bad a defender as many think, and since he has matured basketball wise and overall over the last few years, he has improved substantially at defending.

If you are disturbed by the J.R. Smith rating, don't blame me, the messenger. Blame the Nuggets coaches for not starting him and blame the Nuggets organization and George Karl in particular for planting wild exaggerations in your head about how bad a defender J.R. Smith is.

And don't even think about claiming that an adjustment should be made between starters and non-starters. There are all kinds of reasons why this is a, excuse the cheap pun, non-starter. First of all, it would be way more work than I have time for, and the cost-benefit equation would be miserable. Second, it would involve relatively complicated and arbitrary assumptions, which means it would not necessarily be a valid adjustment. Third, it would distort reality, because like it or not, Smith is a very good defender, particularly in the context of him often playing against reserves.

And fourth, actually, Smith is defending against starters roughly as often as much as he is defending against non-starters since, although he does not start, he is getting a lot of 2nd half minutes where many of the starters of the other team are in.

Furthermore, you can't automatically assume that Smith would be far worse when defending against better offensive players; you don't know how much his defending rating would go down unless you actually find out by having Smith as a starter and try it. Notice that another non-starter, Linas Kleiza, has a very low defending rating despite the fact that, like Smith, he is often defending against not so great offensive players. This indirectly but strongly argues in favor of Smith being given an opportunity to start and to be evaluated fairly as to defending and as to overall net worth as a starter. Whereas with Kleiza, who by the way was recently given the nod over Smith with Carmelo Anthony out, is a high risk starter, since he can't even defend all that well against lower quality offensive players. Sure enough, starting Kleiza was a move that bit Mr. Karl in the rear end, and Kleiza was quickly sent back to the bench.

What this is telling the Nuggets' coaches, who unfortunately are not listening and will never listen, is that they should not be using J.R. Smith's defense anymore as an excuse for not starting him. They simply do not have that as an excuse anymore. They should have used the first few months of this season to try starting Smith out and to see what would happen. They didn't do that because unlike the Pistons for example, the Nuggets feel no need to experiment until they get things just right.

So no, the Nuggets had to go with Dahntay Jones, who previously no one ever thought of as a starter. As you can see from the defending rating, Jones can more than hold his own as a defender in the hidden or untracked aspects of defending, particularly considering he is a guard, but he simply doesn't make enough defensive rebounds, steals, and blocks to rank well in the scored or tracked rating.

In any event, he is simply not qualified offensively to start at 2-guard for a playoff team. Until the Nuggets strategically understand the guard positions, Denver is never going to win a playoff series, it's that simple. It doesn't even matter who they have on the roster, if they don't understand that guards are generally more critical offensively than defensively, they will never win one damn playoff series.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Monday, February 2, 2009

Who Really Won Super Bowl 43, and the Top Reason Why the NBA Playoffs are Better Than the NFL Playoffs

The number one reason why the NBA playoffs are better than the NBA playoffs is that the NBA has best of seven series while the NFL has single game series. In the NFL, every play in every playoff game is far more important than individual plays in basketball playoffs. This makes NFL playoffs more exciting to watch and, sure enough, the NFL gets more viewers than the NBA, but it also means that if an NFL team has the misfortune of a really, really bad play, it can cost them the entire playoff "series" even if overall they were the better team. But in the NBA, the truly better team will win four games before the lessor team does almost all of the time.

Ordinarily, the only exception in the NBA would be where the teams are closely matched. In that case, it's possible that the lessor team might win two or three close games in the best of seven, lose three games by 10 or more points, but win the best of seven series overall. George Karl can dream and be as delusional as he wants, but whoever is the better team is going to win the Nuggets' playoff series, and the Nuggets are not going to be the better team.

Now you look at the official box score for Super Bowl 43 and you tell me who the better team was. As you can see as you go down the huge amount of data showing in the box score, it was the Arizona Cardinals who were actually the better team, but they lost the Super Bowl because of one, single, solitary play. At the very end of the first half, with Kurt Warner and the Cardinals offense in a hurry to score from just a few yards out, Warner threw into the arms of James Harrison, who rumbled about 100 yards down the field past numerous stunned "defenders" who were of course normally offensive players.

So Arizona lost the game because their offensive players could not make a defensive play, which means they lost for a stupid fluke reason. And the Arizona Cardinals lost while trying to win with offense. That can be a real no no in football, whereas in basketball teams can and have won with an offensive focus while maintaining a decent defense, for example, the Chicago Bulls in the 90's.

The problem with football is that a single, fortunate defensive play can trump a great offense. The Harrison 100 yards return for a touchdown is the perfect, ultimate example: one single fluke play was enough to offset the fairly big advantage for Arizona over Pittsburgh offensively. Pittsburgh supposedly has this awesome defense, but the fact is that it was no match for Kurt Warner, Larry Fitzgerald, and the rest of the Arizona offense. Pittsburgh's defense won the game on that one fluke play, which is cheap and unfair to me, speaking as an observer and would be fan. So I'm not going to be a fan of football, and this is one big reason I'm not.

Arizona might have won the game anyway, having all but dismantled the Steeler's supposedly unbreakable defense to take a 23-20 lead with two minutes and change to go. But Pittsburgh QB Ben Roethlisberger, who is a great quarterback under time pressure, scrambled the Steelers' offense down the field in a "two minute drill" with, you guessed it, two minutes and change left in the game. Roethlisberger threw an extremely accurate strike to Santonio Holmes into the extreme corner of the end zone, and the Steelers made the go ahead touchdown with 48 seconds left, despite not one or two but three Cardinals defenders being on Holmes at the time.

The Cardinals had too many defenders on Holmes on that play; they were undoubtedly slowed down just a little by having to avoid running in to each other, just enough so that they lost a step on Holmes. So much for the ideas that the more defense the merrier or that defense always trumps offense. So Super Bowl 43 was won by a team playing good offense (Pittsburgh) over a team playing even better offense (Arizona) due to a fluke defensive play. If you don't count the fluke plays, defense does not always win in the NFL. But if you do count the fluke plays, the overall "defense" generally does win, unless one team has a huge offensive advantage. It's the flukes I don't like; I could put up with the relatively small bias in favor of defense in general.

I don't know about you, but I don't like the idea of one or two plays being more important than all of the plays combined together. So I'll stay with the NBA, where all of the plays combined decide things.

The different organization of teams is another reason I prefer basketball over football. In football, a player is either an offensive player or a defensive player, while in basketball, all players are responsible for both. There are also "special teams" on NFL teams. But what's so special about teams that play in only a handful of plays a game? So NFL teams are actually several teams instead of just one unified team, whereas NBA teams are completely and truly unified. I prefer the unified for several reasons, first of which is that no player can ever blame what happens to his team on a squad that he is not even a part of.

This is the second time in recent years that Arizona has been cheated out of a National Championship. They were cheated by the massive ego and sensitivity of David Stern, who threw the book at the Phoenix Suns in their 2007 playoff showdown with the San Antonio Spurs, clearly costing them the West Finals Series, and the opportunity to meet the one dimensional, LeBron James all the time, Cleveland Cavaliers in the NBA Championship, where they most likely would have won.

There’s an exception to the rule that the best team wins in the NBA playoffs for you: if David Stern and his henchmen get involved, all bets are off.

Shortly thereafter, the Suns ended any chance they would win an NBA ring any time soon by trading Shawn Marion and Marcus Banks for Shaquille O’Neal, and by getting rid of their Coach for insufficient reasons. They haven’t been the same since; confusion has been the main theme in Phoenix since then. And now they are facing losing out to some secondary franchise team such as the Denver Nuggets for the 8th slot in the West playoffs.

There are many thousands in Phoenix who stopped being fans of the NBA after Stern’s rampage. I met some of them and petitioned the NBA along with them for relief from the draconian penalty of not allowing Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw to play in a critical game in Phoenix, when all they did was wander a few inches or feet out on to the court after Steve Nash had been tackled by Robert Horry in what was almost certainly a pre-planned ploy by the Spurs.

Like me, all they wanted was a sport where the best team always wins.

So being kind of a perfectionist and a contrary type (who else has refused to call the Nuggets a success despite their great record so far this season?) I am declaring the Cardinals to be the real winners of Super Bowl 43. Congratulations to Kurt Warner, Larry Fitzgerald, and the rest of the Cardinals, for winning your first super Bowl! You played the way football should be played, and used to be played when it was more exciting, in the 1970's and some of the 1980's. And you won the Super Bowl if the truth were told.

KURT WARNER























LARRY FITZGERALD


































LARRY FITZGERALD


































EDGERRIN JAMES























LARRY FITZGERALD























LARRY FITZGERALD


































KURT WARNER


































LARRY FITZGERALD


































LARRY FITZGERALD IN SUPER BOWL 43


































KURT WARNER, LARRY FITZGERALD
























SUPER BOWL 43 HIGHLIGHTS


LARRY FITZGERALD: MVP SUPER BOWL 43






















BallHype: hype it up!











You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here